Bikini and Enewetak Atolls Nuclear tests 67 Atomic Tests - Marshall Islands
Bikini and Enewetak Atolls, Marshall Islands
Nuclear testing on the Bikini and Enewetak atolls left entire islands uninhabitable, exposed thousands to high levels of radioactivity and contributed to global nuclear fallout.
History
The atolls of Bikini and Enewetak are part of the Marshall Islands and were occupied during WWII first by Japanese and later by U.S. forces. The islands were chosen by the U.S. for the first nuclear explosion after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. On July 1, 1946, after forcibly evacuating all islanders, “Test Able” was detonated over a fleet of captured ships in order to test the effect of a nuclear bomb on enemy navies. Of the 78 vessels, 5 were sunk and 14 destroyed; one third of the animals, which had been placed on the ships, died from the blast. Sailors were ordered to scrub the fallout from the decks, exposing them to high doses of radioactivity. As decontamination was unsuccessful, many of the ships were scuttled in the Pacific.
Altogether between 1946 and 1958, the Bikini and Enewetak Atolls were host to 67 nuclear explosions with a total yield of about 214 megatons. The most devastating was the 15 megaton “Castle Bravo” hydrogen bomb test in 1954, the largest nuclear yield ever achieved by the U.S. – more than 1,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb. Nuclear fallout reached halfway across the globe – from Australia to the U.S. and Europe.
More than 400 nuclear tests were conducted worldwide before the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963 put an end to atmospheric testing. By that time, high amounts of radioactive strontium-90 had been found in children’s teeth; a strong indication of the extent to which the entire world population had been irradiated by nuclear weapons testing.
Health and environmental effects
A review of the dosimeters worn by servicemen during “routine” nuclear tests found radioactive exposition doses of up to 600 mSv during a two week mission. This dose corresponds to about 7,500 times natural background radiation (approximately 0.09 mSv over the course of two weeks) or the equivalent of 30,000 chest x-rays (0.02 mSv). Internal radiation exposure was not considered in this review.
But not all tests were “routine”: In 1954, the “Castle Bravo” test exceeded the expected yield by 200 % and spread radioactive fallout over more than 11,000 km², contaminating several inhabited island including Rongerik, Rongelap and Utrik, as well as a Japanese fishing vessel. Many islanders and the Japanese crew suffered acute radiation sickness from external radiation. Inhabitants of contaminated islands were evacuated a few days after “Castle Bravo,” but long-term studies showed increased levels of cancer, especially of the thyroid, most likely due to internal radiation with iodine-131.
While radioactive iodine is among the most dangerous acute radioisotope spread by nuclear tests, the most significant long-term sources of radioactivity are long-lived radioisotopes such as cesium, strontium and plutonium, which were deposited over the islands by fallout. They can cause cancer through radioactive emissions inside the body once ingested or inhaled.
The atoll of Enewetak was decontaminated after the cessation of nuclear tests, with all radioactive debris sealed under an eight meter high concrete sarcophagus, dubbed “Cactus Dome.” The Bikini atoll on the other hand was deemed too contaminated for clean-up and the indigenous Bikinians had to be relocated several times, even coming close to starvation when they were sent to islands which did not yield any crops. Even in 1994, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) still found the Bikini atoll to be too radioactively polluted for resettlement, with animal and plant life still highly contaminated.
Outlook
After conducting more than 1,000 nuclear tests, the U.S. stopped their nuclear test program in 1992, but has still not ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) which prohibits nuclear test explosions. In 1986, a 150 million dollar trust fund was set up in order to compensate Marshallese people who were exposed to fallout from nuclear testing. However, about 40 % of the affected people died without receiving their full compensation, which was in any case very little, prompting the president of the Marshall Islands to send a petition to the U.S. Congress in 2000, calling for further decontamination projects, a more inclusive compensation scheme and better health surveillance. The petition fell on deaf ears, and many islanders took legal action, but were rebuked by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2010. While their government has filed a law-suit against the nuclear weapon states in the International Court of Justice for their failure to comply with their obligation to disarm under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Hibakusha of the Marshall Islands continue their fight for recognition and compensation.
The nuclear chain
The various steps needed to process uranium for use are often referred to as the "nuclear fuel cycle". In reality, it has nothing to do with recycling and is more like a path leading to a dead-end, beginning with the natural resource of uranium and ending with nuclear waste. That's why we prefer to call it a "nuclear chain". Each link in this chain, beginning with uranium mining and the transportation of "Yellow Cake", followed by its use for nuclear power or nuclear bombs, the reprocessing of used fuel rods to make plutonium, and ending in nuclear waste or fallout from nuclear explosions, each of these damages the environment and human health irreparably. Millions of people are suffering around the world from the effects of this civilian and military nuclear industry - two sides of the same coin - that is behind the nuclear chain.
References
“1 July 1946 – ‘Test Able’, Bikini Atoll.” Website of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO).www.ctbto.org/?id=3339
Ragheb M. “Probabilistic, possibilistic and deterministic safety analysis – Nuclear Applications. Chapter 6: Environmental remediation of radioactive contamination.” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, August 26, 2013.http://mragheb.com/NPRE%20457%20CSE%20462%20Safety%20Analysis%20of%20Nuclear%20Reactor%20Systems/Title-Preface.pdf
Smith et al. “Summary Site Profile for the Pacific Proving Ground.” Dose Reconstruction Project for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), August 30, 2006.www.cdc.gov/Niosh/ocas/pdfs/tbd/ppgr0.pdf
“1 March 1954 – Castle Bravo.” Website of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO).www.ctbto.org/specials/testing-times/1-march-1954-castle-bravo
Mangano et al. “Elevated in vivo strontium-90 from nuclear weapons test fallout among cancer decedents.” Int.J.Health Serv.Vol 41:1,2011. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21319726
Robbins et al. “Radiation effects in the Marshall Islands,” in: “Radiation and the Thyroid: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Nuclear Medical Society.” Nagataki S, Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1989.www.yokwe.net/ydownloads/RadiationEffectsintheMarshallIslands.pdf
Mason L. “From a time of starvation to a time for hope: the relocation of the Bikini Marshallese.” University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, 1988
“Conditions at Bikini Atoll – Radiological Conditions at Bikini Atoll and the Prospects of Resettlement.” Website of the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA. www-ns.iaea.org/appraisals/bikini-atoll.asp
Source: www.nuclear-risks.org - http://www.nuclear-risks.org/en/hibakusha-worldwide/bikini-and-enewetak-atolls.html
Veterans of the 1970s Enewetak Atoll atomic cleanup veterans
"The primary focus for this group is to urge Congress to change legislation and recognize soldiers of this seemingly forgotten cleanup mission as “veterans who participated in radiation-risk activities during active service.”
Follow our Story - Enewetak Atoll Clean-up Veterans
